Start rulemapping refactor to be more explicit about typing intentions.
This commit is contained in:
parent
08fc828b46
commit
a0949e719f
10 changed files with 128 additions and 100 deletions
94
internal/mappingrules/mapping_rule_button_test.go
Normal file
94
internal/mappingrules/mapping_rule_button_test.go
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
|
|||
package mappingrules
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/holoplot/go-evdev"
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/suite"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
type MappingRuleButtonTests struct {
|
||||
suite.Suite
|
||||
inputDevice *evdev.InputDevice
|
||||
wrongInputDevice *evdev.InputDevice
|
||||
outputDevice *evdev.InputDevice
|
||||
mode *string
|
||||
sampleRule *MappingRuleButton
|
||||
invertedRule *MappingRuleButton
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (t *MappingRuleButtonTests) SetupTest() {
|
||||
t.inputDevice = &evdev.InputDevice{}
|
||||
t.wrongInputDevice = &evdev.InputDevice{}
|
||||
t.outputDevice = &evdev.InputDevice{}
|
||||
mode := "*"
|
||||
t.mode = &mode
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: implement a constructor function...
|
||||
t.sampleRule = &MappingRuleButton{
|
||||
MappingRuleBase: MappingRuleBase{
|
||||
Modes: []string{"*"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Input: NewRuleTargetButton("", t.inputDevice, evdev.BTN_TRIGGER, false),
|
||||
Output: NewRuleTargetButton("", t.outputDevice, evdev.BTN_TRIGGER, false),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t.invertedRule = &MappingRuleButton{
|
||||
MappingRuleBase: MappingRuleBase{
|
||||
Modes: []string{"*"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Output: NewRuleTargetButton("", t.outputDevice, evdev.BTN_TRIGGER, false),
|
||||
Input: NewRuleTargetButton("", t.inputDevice, evdev.BTN_TRIGGER, true),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (t *MappingRuleButtonTests) TestMatchEvent() {
|
||||
// A matching input event should produce an output event
|
||||
correctOutput := &evdev.InputEvent{
|
||||
Type: evdev.EV_KEY,
|
||||
Code: evdev.BTN_TRIGGER,
|
||||
Value: 1,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
_, event := t.sampleRule.MatchEvent(
|
||||
t.inputDevice,
|
||||
&evdev.InputEvent{Code: evdev.BTN_TRIGGER, Value: 1}, t.mode)
|
||||
t.EqualValues(correctOutput, event)
|
||||
|
||||
// An input event from the wrong device should produce a nil event
|
||||
_, event = t.sampleRule.MatchEvent(
|
||||
t.wrongInputDevice,
|
||||
&evdev.InputEvent{Code: evdev.BTN_TRIGGER, Value: 1}, t.mode)
|
||||
t.Nil(event)
|
||||
|
||||
// An input event from the wrong button should produce a nil event
|
||||
_, event = t.sampleRule.MatchEvent(
|
||||
t.inputDevice,
|
||||
&evdev.InputEvent{Code: evdev.BTN_TOP, Value: 1}, t.mode)
|
||||
t.Nil(event)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (t *MappingRuleButtonTests) TestMatchEventInverted() {
|
||||
// A matching input event should produce an output event
|
||||
correctOutput := &evdev.InputEvent{
|
||||
Type: evdev.EV_KEY,
|
||||
Code: evdev.BTN_TRIGGER,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Should get the opposite value out that we send in
|
||||
correctOutput.Value = 0
|
||||
_, event := t.invertedRule.MatchEvent(
|
||||
t.inputDevice,
|
||||
&evdev.InputEvent{Code: evdev.BTN_TRIGGER, Value: 1}, t.mode)
|
||||
t.EqualValues(correctOutput, event)
|
||||
|
||||
correctOutput.Value = 1
|
||||
_, event = t.invertedRule.MatchEvent(
|
||||
t.inputDevice,
|
||||
&evdev.InputEvent{Code: evdev.BTN_TRIGGER, Value: 0}, t.mode)
|
||||
t.EqualValues(correctOutput, event)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestRunnerMatching(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
suite.Run(t, new(MappingRuleButtonTests))
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue